Tasers in prisons to be trialled after Abedi attack
“The use of Tasers in prisons will be trialled after officers were injured by the brother of the Manchester Arena bomber, the justice secretary has said.
The Prison Officers’ Association (POA) had called for staff to have access to electric stun guns in light of Hashem Abedi’s use of makeshift weapons to attack staff at HMP Frankland, a high-security prison in County Durham.
Shabana Mahmood told the Commons on Tuesday: “Wherever we can strengthen our defences, to better protect our staff and the public, we will do so.”
However, POA chairman Mark Fairhurst told the BBC he did not believe a trial was necessary and called for their use to be rolled out “before one of my members is murdered”.
Three officers received hospital treatment after the attack on 12 April. One remains in hospital in a stable condition, while two others have since been discharged.
At the time of the attack Abedi was held in a separation wing used to house the most dangerous and extremist prisoners.
However, he had access to a kitchen, where he was able to heat cooking oil and fashion weapons from equipment which he used to assault the officers.
Following calls for urgent action to keep prison staff safer, Mahmood confirmed HM Prison and Probation service would begin a trial on the use of electric stun guns.
It is due to be launched in the summer and will be limited to facilities housing adult males.
She said a separate independent review into the attack would “ascertain how this incident was able to happen, what more must be done to protect prison staff and, more widely, how separation centres are run”.
Mahmood has previously ordered a “snap review” into the use of protective body armour for prison staff.
She paid tribute to the “bravery of the officers involved that day”, which she said “undoubtedly saved lives”.
Mr Fairhurst, who is due to meet the justice secretary on Wednesday, said the attack had been a clear indication that officers faced urgent danger, and disputed the need for a trial period before allowing prison staff access to electric stun guns.
“The police force has used this equipment for years, we know it’s effective,” he said.
Mr Fairhurst said the equipment should be rolled out in all high-security facilities and used by specially trained staff. He continued: “If not, our lives are on the line.”
Currently, prison officers are only able to carry an extendable baton and synthetic pepper spray.
Abedi, who helped his older brother Salman plan the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing, was jailed for life with a minimum 55 years in prison after being convicted of murdering 22 people.
He had been moved to Frankland after carrying out an earlier attack on prison officers in London’s Belmarsh prison in 2020, for which three years and 10 months was added to his sentence.”
Introduction
The management of prisons is a multifaceted issue that involves balancing security, rehabilitation, and the humane treatment of inmates. Recent discussions have emerged regarding the introduction of stun guns for prison officers, raising concerns about potential abuses of power and the implications for inmate-staff relations. This article explores these concerns through the lens of an individual with extensive experience in the prison system.
The Potential for Abuse of Power
Stun Guns and Increased Violence
The introduction of stun guns in prisons is viewed by some as a misguided approach to managing inmate behavior. Critics argue that arming officers with such devices may escalate violence rather than mitigate it. The perspective of a long-term inmate suggests that the presence of stun guns could lead to more aggressive interactions between staff and prisoners. This viewpoint emphasizes a fundamental principle: respect. When inmates are treated with dignity, they are more likely to respond positively.
The Role of Respect in Prison Dynamics
Respect is a two-way street. The assertion that “if you treat a prisoner like an animal, they will act like an animal” underscores the importance of humane treatment. Inmates often feel marginalized and bullied by prison staff, which can exacerbate tensions within the facility. The focus on punitive measures, such as the Incentives and Earned Privileges (I.E.P.) scheme, is seen as a form of bullying rather than a constructive approach to rehabilitation.
Staff Inexperience and Communication Challenges
The Need for Training
A significant issue highlighted is the inexperience of prison staff. Many officers lack the necessary training to handle complex situations, particularly those involving inmates with serious mental health issues. This gap in knowledge can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts. Instead of resorting to force, staff should be equipped with skills in communication and conflict resolution.
The Importance of Mental Health Awareness
Inmates often struggle with mental health challenges, which can manifest in various ways. The argument is made that prison officers should be trained to recognize and respond to these issues effectively. By fostering an environment of understanding and support, the likelihood of violent incidents may decrease.
The Role of Technology in Prisons
Drones and Security Concerns
As of 2025, the use of drones in prisons has primarily been associated with the smuggling of contraband, such as drugs and mobile phones. The concern is that introducing stun guns could lead to a further escalation in the types of contraband entering prisons, including firearms. This potential for increased violence raises questions about the effectiveness of current security measures and the need for a more comprehensive approach to prison management.
The Distinction Between Officers and Police
A critical point made is the distinction between prison officers and police officers. The role of a prison officer should focus on rehabilitation and maintaining order within the facility, rather than adopting a law enforcement mentality. This shift in perspective is essential for creating a more positive environment for both staff and inmates.
Conclusion
The debate surrounding the introduction of stun guns in prisons highlights significant concerns about the potential for abuse of power and the need for improved communication and training among staff. By prioritizing respect and understanding, the prison system can work towards reducing violence and fostering a more rehabilitative environment. As discussions continue, it is crucial to consider the long-term implications of these policies on both inmates and staff, ensuring that the focus remains on humane treatment and effective rehabilitation.
No comments:
Post a Comment