Sunday, 31 May 2015

Petition


We have a petition and I sincerely ask you all to sign it for us
"To abolish the minimum term tariff and overview the whole uk lifers system"
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/to-abolish-the-minimum-term-tariff-and-overview 

 http://www.ipetitions.com/                                                                                                                           
I really think this is an important cause, and I'd like to encourage you to add your signature, too. It's free and takes just a few seconds of your time.
Thanks!

Saturday, 30 May 2015

Prisoner escapes from Dovegate


Police warn people not to approach Haroon Ahmed, who is understood to have walked out of jail with a group of visitors.
08:58, UK, Saturday 30 May 2015
Haroon Ahmed, 26, from the Derby area, escaped from HMP Dovegate.
A violent convict is on the run from prison after walking out with a group of visitors.
Police are hunting Haroon Ahmed, who escaped from HMP Dovegate, near Marchington in Staffordshire, on Wednesday afternoon.
It is understood he managed to leave the high-security prison, which is run by private firm Serco, among a group of people who had visited him, despite being on a "watch list".
Members of the public have been urged not to approach the 26-year-old if they see him, but to call 999 instead.
Ahmed, who was jailed for robbery, is described as Asian, 6ft tall and thin.
He has short black hair and was last seen wearing jeans and a grey T-shirt.
Ahmed is believed to be in the Derby area, where he is from.
His brother, Majeed Ahmed, 25, of Clarence Road, Derby, has been charged with assisting a prisoner in escaping from prison.
He has been released on bail to appear before magistrates in Burton on 25 June.
A black Volkswagen Golf recovered as part of the investigation has been forensically examined.
Michael Guy, Serco's director at HMP Dovegate, said: "We are taking this extremely seriously and I have commissioned an urgent investigation into the circumstances of the escape.
"We are working closely with the police to identify what went wrong and to address any failings."
A Prison Service spokesperson said: "Escapes from prison custody are extremely rare but we take each one incredibly seriously. Public protection is our top priority.
"A prisoner at HMP Dovegate was found to be missing on Wednesday 27 May.
"We are working closely with the police as part of their investigation."
HMP Dovegate was criticised by the Chief Inspector of Prisons in a report published on Friday.
It found there were high levels of violence in the jail and said visiting arrangements were poor.
:: Anyone who knows where Ahmed is should call Staffordshire Police on 101 or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111

 

Wednesday, 18 March 2015

Prisoners victory


A sex offender, who suffers from a range of health problems made worse by second-hand smoke, calls for the ban to be enforced.
12:40, UK, Thursday 05 March 2015
A prison cell

A High Court judge has ruled the ban on smoking in public places applies to all prisons, despite fears it could lead to unrest in jails in England and Wales.
Paul Black, an inmate at HMP Wymott in Lancashire, brought the case against the Crown, complaining he was frequently exposed to second-hand smoke in public areas such as landings, laundries and healthcare unit waiting rooms.
He said he suffers from a range of health problems made worse by smoke.
Smoking is allowed in cells with the doors shut, but banned in communal areas.
Black argued not enough was being done to stop prisoners and staff lighting up in areas that were supposed to be smoke-free.


00:00/02:07
Advert
Buffering

The judge rejected an argument by Justice Secretary Chris Grayling that the 2006 Health Act does not "bind the Crown" and therefore does not apply in state prisons.
Mr Justice Singh said: "In my judgment it is clear from the terms of the 2006 Act ... that the intention of Parliament was indeed that it should apply to all public places and workplaces which fell within its scope, including those for which the Crown is responsible."
The Act makes smoking a criminal offence in enclosed public places and workplaces.
Black, a convicted sex offender, went to court to argue that inmates should be able to make anonymous calls to the NHS freephone line set up to report infringements of the rules.
Although he did not win a ruling on access to the hotline, the judge said Mr Grayling would be expected to re-examine the issue after the latest ruling.
He acknowledged there might be good reasons "in the interests of of security and order in prisons why prisoners should not generally be allowed confidential and anonymous access to external phone numbers".
Black is currently serving a sentence of indeterminate detention for public protection (IPP) after being convicted of sexual assault and outraging public decency.



 
 



 
 
 



 
 

 


 

 

 

 
 

 
 
 

.



 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 
 

 
.



 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 


 


mike927
Brack 1969
sharm11
Candy Stripes
animal64
o0 St George 0o
Millybang4
1080p
The Contrarian
iloveuinamanlyway

Saturday, 21 February 2015

Human rights re: votes

ECHR rejected claims for compensation and legal costs .
The three judges unanimously agreed there had been a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights - right to free elections.
This was due to the "blanket character" of the statutory ban.
  


 
The court made the ruling as it was identical to other prisoner voting cases in which a breach had been found, while no changes had been made to the law.
There has been pressure on the UK authorities to bring in legislation on prisoner voting.
The Council of Europe's Committee noted last September its "profound concern and disappointment" that a Bill had not been introduced.
Prime Minister David Cameron has previously said the controversial issue should be for Parliament to decide and not a "foreign court".
Sean Humber, the lawyer representing 554 prisoners fighting for the right to vote, welcomed the ECHR's ruling, but said compensation should have been awarded, particularly given the lack of government action.
Pointing out the ruling had confirmed the "unlawfulness" of the blanket ban, Mr Humber said successive UK governments had "cynically sought to drag the matter out through a succession of consultations during the last decade".
Mr Humber, from the firm Leigh Day, said: "Unfortunately, we seem to be in the sad position where the Government is taking an almost perverse pleasure in ignoring successive court judgments and is content to continue violating the human rights of thousands of its citizens.
"It should be worrying to all of us that the Government appears to have so little regard for its international human rights obligations or indeed the rule of law."
But the Ministry of Justice said the issue of prisoner voting should be decided in the UK.
An MoJ spokesman said: "The Government has always been clear that it believes prisoner voting is an issue that should ultimately be decided in the UK.
"However, we welcome the court's decision to refuse convicted prisoners costs or damages."
UKIP's home affairs spokesperson, Diane James MEP, said: "UKIP believes that it should be the British parliament which should have the final decision on which laws are implemented in the Britain.
"There should be no unwarranted interference in a national issue."

Thursday, 15 January 2015

1 step nearer home

Well a miracle has happened my son has been moved from Durham to Preston to be
nearer home yes it may be a bit nearer but not that much, anyway beggars can't be
choosers and we have to be thankful for all small mercies however small or large they are.

He has just phoned me to say he has arrived at the new prison and will talk later as there is a
lot of things for him to do.

Good luck to all the other families that are in our situation and lets hope they have a bit of luck like us at least.

Wednesday, 31 December 2014

Not A Lot of News But taking this moment to wish Everyone who reads this and have supported us
TO WISH YOU ALL A VERY HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR FOR 2015 AND MAY EVERYTHING YOU WISH COME TRUE.

Monday, 29 December 2014

16th December 2014
 
Dear Mr
 
Re: Your Letter
 
I write in connection with the above which was received by me on the 15th December 2014.
 
You are entirely correct in what you say, and I am very conscious of the fact that the daily struggles experienced by lifer prisoners are not just problems suffered by IPP inmates.
In the New Year, I propose, having received your letter, to draft an article in Inside Time concerning all lifer inmates and not just to restrict myself to IPP prisoners.
Your letter was very well received. 
 
Yours sincerely
 
David Wells
WELLS BURCOMBE LLP
 
 The above is a copy of a email sent to my son and below is an excerpt from the inside times for December 2014

Over-tariff IPPs: an appeal for your stories

By David Wells - Partner, Wells Burcombe Solicitors, from insidetime issue December 2014
Two years ago the then Justice Secretary announced that IPP sentences were being abolished...

Over-tariff IPPs: an
appeal for your stories
Two years ago the then Justice Secretary announced that IPP sentences were being abolished. This was undoubtedly good news for those practising within the criminal justice system, but regrettably of no comfort to those serving IPP sentences at the time as the announcement was not applied retrospectively. This means that there are still thousands of IPP inmates left rotting in a prison system clearly incapable of addressing the rehabilitative requirements designed to reduce risk.
But there are still criminal practitioners, like me, and others outside the criminal justice system who take a great deal of interest in IPP prisoners. One such person is a journalist from the BBC, Zoe Conway, who reported on IPP prisoners for BBC Newsnight earlier this year. She wishes to continue to highlight the plight of those affected by this most draconian sentence. She has visited and listened to numerous family members who report the daily struggles of inmates to access courses and to prepare properly for parole board hearings. She and I discussed the recent debate in the House of Lords which announced new government figures which show that 121 people sentenced before 2008 to a tariff of 12 months or less are still languishing in prison. 8 of them were given tariffs of 3 months, 22 tariffs of less than 6 months and yet they are still inside. She quite rightly stated that most people would be surprised and perhaps shocked by this. Indeed, one House of Lords Peer when he learned of the many inmates well beyond tariff said 'how can that be justified.' He is right. It can't.
Even the Justice Secretary who abolished the sentence two years ago described the sentence itself as a stain on the criminal justice system. But perhaps even more alarmingly, the man responsible for the sentence all those years ago, the then Home Secretary David Blunkett, told BBC Newsnight that the sentence had in some cases led to 'injustices' and said ''I regret that''. He also told Zoe Conway, in her interview with him, that the Labour government ''got the implementation wrong''. He acknowledged that the problems with access to courses and the serious lack of resources generally was not foreseen. That statement alone is nothing short of shocking.
IPP sentences were to be reserved for only the most seriously violent and sexual offences. It was anticipated that this would affect about 900 prisoners. In 2011 there were 6000 IPP inmates. Now there are 5,500 and two-thirds of these are over tariff.
So what can be done? Apart from continuing to consider appealing IPP sentences where this has not been considered previously, and focusing on parole and sentence plan targets as best as possible in order to support release, individuals like Zoe Conway, who have great influence in the media can help. What is her aim? Well, she wants to find out who these inmates are serving these shorter tariffs, why they are still in prison and whether they are able to access courses and parole board hearings. She would like to tell individual and collective stories for broadcast on national news.
It is for this reason that I invite all such IPP inmates to write to me to share your stories. If you agree to share your plight with her through me, you can write to me and I will pass on your correspondence. You do not have to agree to have your name published or made public. You can simply share your story, the problems you have faced and obviously your own views on the position you face.
For my part, my firm continues to do all it can to ensure natural progression and even release for IPP inmates. Wells Burcombe have enjoyed much success at the Appeal Courts and have enjoyed equal success before the Parole Board. Wells Burcombe continue to receive numerous enquiries from IPP inmates concerning Parole. Should you have a pending Parole review or wish for advice concerning appealing your IPP sentence, simply write to us at the address below.
Wells Burcombe Solicitors
5 Holywell Hill, St Albans, Hertfordshire, AL1 1EU




Back to top

Sunday, 14 December 2014

Well another Christmas is creeping up on us and I am still no nearer to being home with my family.

I nearly lost my Dad back in August but could not get a compassionate visit to see him, luckily
he pulled through although still very weak he had his 94th birthday in October.

Mum has had it hard with dad being so ill, plus my sister has been ill as well, so hence the reason why there as not been very much in the way of  updates.

Hopefully things will look up in the new year we can only hope.

Would like to wish everyone who has looked at my blog a Very Merry Christmas to you all and
a Prosperous New Year to you all and keep on reading my blog

Friday, 5 December 2014






BBC News UK

 




Prison book ban ruled unlawful by High Court

Prison cell

Related Stories

The government's ban on sending books to prisoners in England and Wales is unlawful, the High Court has declared.
Under the current rules prisoners are prevented from receiving parcels unless they have "exceptional circumstances", such as a medical condition.
Mr Justice Collins said he could see "no good reason" to restrict access to books for prisoners.
The Prison Service said it was a surprising judgement, and would look at how it would deal with the ruling.
Incentives scheme The legal challenge was brought by inmate Barbara Gordon-Jones, who is serving part of her life sentence at Send prison near Woking in Surrey.
The book ban was introduced in November last year in England and Wales, as part of a scheme which limits what prisoners can receive in parcels.
The Incentives and Earned Privileges scheme was brought in partly as an attempt to crack down on drugs getting into prisons.
Prisoners had argued that books sent to them in parcels can be key to their rehabilitation.
Prisoners are still able to read books borrowed from a prison library - and last month the Ministry of Justice relaxed restrictions on the number of books they could keep in their cells.
But it has been claimed that prison libraries are often inadequately stocked, and can be hard to access because there is not always staff available to take prisoners to them.
'Unnecessary and irrational' Mr Justice Collins said: "I see no good reason in the light of the importance of books for prisoners to restrict beyond what is required by volumetric control and reasonable measures relating to frequency of parcels and security considerations."
He said that the scheme referred to prisoners earning privileges, and added: "In the light of the statement made about the importance of books... to refer to them as a privilege is strange."
A Prison Service spokesman said: "This is a surprising judgement. There never was a specific ban on books and the restrictions on parcels have been in existence across most of the prison estate for many years and for very good reason.
"Prisoners have access to the same public library service as the rest of us, and can buy books through the prison shop.
"We are considering how best to fulfil the ruling of the court. However, we are clear that we will not do anything that would create a new conduit for smuggling drugs and extremist materials into our prisons."
Poet laureate Carol Ann Duffy Poet laureate Carol Ann Duffy campaigned against the rules
In a statement, solicitors for Barbara Gordon-Jones welcomed the ruling.
"Reading is a right and not a privilege, to be encouraged and not restricted," they said.
"Indeed, Mr Justice Collins commented that, as far as books are concerned, 'to refer to them as a privilege is strange'.
"The policy was unnecessary, irrational and counter-productive to rehabilitation. It is now rightly judged unlawful."
The shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan described the existing rules as "absurd".
"It had nothing to do with punishing and reforming prisoners but was an example of David Cameron's government's sloppy policy-making," he said.
The Liberal Democrats' home affairs spokesman Julian Huppert said: "We need education in our prisons. It's vital from the moment people walk through the door they get the help and rehabilitation they need to ensure they don't end up back behind bars."
'Responsibility to rehabilitate' Erwin James, who served 20 years for murder, described the original ban as "outrageous", and said books had helped him in prison.
He told BBC Radio 4's World at One: "I learnt that a good book can change the way you think about life. I was sent books by authors, I was sent books by probation officers.
"I was sent a book called The Grass Arena by John Healy, an amazing book of survival and redemption. You know, it was so important, so important for developing my own thinking and my own understanding of who I was and where I was going."
The rules have been opposed by arts' figures including Poet laureate Carol Ann Duffy, actress Vanessa Redgrave and author Kathy Lette.
A protest was held outside Pentonville Prison in north London in March.
Girl with a Pearl Earring author Tracy Chevalier. who also campaigned against the ban, said she was delighted with the ruling.
She told the BBC: "To me, books are an obvious way to help prisoners. We have a responsibility not just to punish people, but to rehabilitate them.
"Prison is the perfect time to read and to get inside the heads of other people. So that maybe, when you come out, you're more likely to think about other people rather than just yourself."
Author Philip Pullman said: "The ban on sending prisoners books seemed to me strikingly unjust and inhumane. Reading should be a right not a privilege to be withheld or allowed graciously by Her Majesty's government, or anyone else"

 PS

I DON*T UNDERSTAND WHY THE PRISON SERVICE AND THE GOVERMENT  DONT RESPECT OUR RIGHTS. WE ARE CHANGING THIS BLOG SO PEOPLE LIKE YOURSELF CAN  LEAVE  COMMENTS, THERE WILL BE NO ANNOMANOMOUS  COMMENTS. BE PROUD FOR WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU STAND UP FOR


Sunday, 26 October 2014

Muslim inmate at IoW Prison planned kidnap and escape


Parkhurst Prison, now part of HMP Isle of Wight The Ministry of Justice said a "very basic description" of the prison interior was found

Related Stories


Detailed plans to kidnap a prison officer in a bid to escape from the Isle of Wight Prison, were found in the cell of a Muslim inmate.

An internal Prison Service document, seen by the BBC, reveals an Islamic State, or ISIS, flag was also found in the cell at the jail's Parkhurst site.

The prisoner was placed in the jail's close supervision unit.

A Ministry of Justice (MoJ) spokesman said security measures had been shown to be "robust" by the discovery.
'Detailed' plans
Details of the incident were contained in the weekly security bulletin of the National Offender Management Service which is compiled for all prisons in England and Wales.

In the bulletin for the week ending 19 October, it says "acting on intelligence a prisoner's cell was searched".

"Detailed escape plans involving taking a member of staff hostage were discovered."

It says activity at the prison was restricted "whilst the accommodation and his associates were searched".

The MoJ said "a very basic description" of the interior of the prison was found in the inmate's cell by "vigilant" staff, demonstrating the "effectiveness of its security measures".

HMP Isle of Wight was created in 2009 with the merger of Parkhurst, Albany and Camp Hill prisons.

 


 

 

Sunday, 28 September 2014

 Check out the forgotton IPP's Lifers write up  from Simon Rollason. I wouls like to welcome him to Voice for Cons and we are now getting up and running slowly and surely tell your friends and family about us and give a link to other sites. Good luck Simon from Frankie. Simon has very kindly offered to put some legal imput and to start up a campaign for The forgotton Lifers Past Tarrif.

Friday, 19 September 2014

The Forgotten Lifers

By Simon Rollason - GC Law Ltd, from insidetime issue September 2014
IPP didn’t start the fire

The Forgotten Lifers
Following the decision in Osborn and the unprecedented increase in Parole Board reviews, a considerable amount of interest has been generated in the national media regarding IPP sentences.
Of course, this interest must be applauded and any pressure which can be applied to finally curtail this monstrous piece of legislation should be welcomed. However, there are other prisoners in the estate who to a significant degree can find themselves understandably frustrated by the spotlight being set on IPP and at the same time leaving them in the shadows. They are those imposed an automatic life sentence between 1997 and April 2005, essentially for a second offence for one of 11 very serious offences, commonly referred to as the 'two strikes and you're out' sentence.
The history of such punitive periods for lifers started when life sentences were introduced in 1983 by the then Conservative administration. This was amongst other things as a result of the policy of "Three Strikes system" in the United States. However, the philosophy of US penal policy is somewhat different from that in the European Continent. The ideology and driver behind the US "Three Strikes system" is in my belief based upon the fundamental US premise that 'rehabilitation doesn't work', which means lock criminals up forever or kill them; both options are ridiculously expensive.
However, the European ideology is essentially one of working toward rehabilitation. The UK wants to go down the US system but realises it is too expensive, (even with the savings it can make with contracts to the private sector) and at the same time it has to contend with the European Courts and therefore it is limited from going the whole way.
In short, although in recent months the public and media attention has been focused that IPPs are a bad idea and the implementation of them was ill thought out, the reality is that the fundamental model of sentencing policy is not fit for the purpose of what one would hope is a modern enlightened and pragmatic penal system. Sadly, the current administration would appear to have contempt for the whole issue of prisons in relegating the minister in charge to an unpaid role, I am given to understand. There is a saying, if you pay peanuts you get monkeys ... what happens when you are not paying anything at all?
There are two ways to stop recidivism, lock up offenders forever or have a programme of proper rehabilitation, with proper access to the resources to enable that rehabilitation. The current position is an ill-conceived adhoc 'compromise' of the two. The concerns highlighted with IPP sentences recently are equally valid for life sentences. The Parole Board and the Prison Service need a full time paid minister with a full grasp of the issues to implement a dramatic review of automatic lifers. Sadly, given the current 'demotion' in status, I have to conclude the will is not there on their part to do so.
Simon Rollason is a Solicitor Advocate and Prison Law Specialist at GC Law Ltd in Hereford. Simon has represented inmates on Death Row in The State of Texas.


 
 
As printed in The Inside Times
Inside Time

Issue : September 2014

 
Back Issues
 

Monday, 24 March 2014

Had fantastic visit with my son on Saturday
Long journey but worth every minute of the time.
Hope to be able to go again Thursday.
Good news he has had his AV stay extended not
sure how long for but anytime is better than none.
Especially after not seeing him for nearly 5 years.

Friday, 21 March 2014

Early to bed tonight ready for the morning and journey to see my son 1st time in five years. Not looking forward to journey but I am looking forward to seeing my son at long last.


Not sure how long he is where he is but have got another visit booked for almost a weeks time

Wednesday, 19 March 2014

Frankie is quiet pleased at moment with the visit on Saturday with me , my daughter
Son in law and two of my grandchildren.
He is still unable to get in contact with his legal team except via me at moment.
He says it is a lot quieter where he is at moment and food is edible.

Tuesday, 18 March 2014

A MIRACLE HAS HAPPENED

OMG IT IS HAPPENING I WILL BE SEING MY SON FOR TJHE FIRST TIME IN FIVE YEARS.
ON SATURDAY AT 2pm
THANK YOU LONG LARTIN FOR MAKING THIS POSSIBLE FOR ME AND SOME OF MY FAMILY.
Will keep you updated as to how things have gone they offered me another visit on Sunday as well
but not sure if I can manage two trips in two days with my health problems I think it may be too much for me. I am shaking like a leaf at the moment.

Monday, 17 March 2014

Waste of Time

Been at Long Lartin 11 days still no visits because VO's never got sent out took 1 week for it to be returned to me.
1 whole week wasted now told there are no visits available for weekends, knowing there are AV's down for their visits surely they should keep a few visits back for them. Really cheesed off looked forward ton seeing my mum have not seen her for 5 years she is 70 now even with AV's still unable to see my dad he is 93 with cancer so is unable to male journey.

Well fingers crossed that I will be able to get at least 1 visit with my mum before they ship me back to Frankland

Thursday, 13 March 2014

4 years of waiting no visits now 28days 3 and half hour journey for family

I am at Long Lartin for AV's only been waiting 4 years.
Still a long journey for family though.
Waiting Inside Times to try and someone to update it more
regular as mum is finding it hard
with health problems.

Anyone who knows anyone who is interested please email     voiceforcons@gmail.com                                                                                                                                                         

Tuesday, 4 February 2014

Had lots of trouble with prison service re my post not getting through.
Lots of problems still not solved.
Hoping still that it will sort out soon.
I am asking a friend of mine to take over the updating of the blog
I just hope he will be able to do it for me.
My mum has not been too good lately,hence no updates.
Will let you know when I hear from the othe guy if he can do it.

Saturday, 5 October 2013

This is an excerpt from Inside Times  which I know a lot people reading this will not know what it is all about, it is a paper for all prisoners.


Frankie my son is a lifer with an 8 year tariffs and is soon to be starting his 23rd year with no signs of release. 


Lifers – A Time For Change

By Kenny Carter , from insidetime issue August 2010
Kenny Carter calls for a fairer system for lifers who have passed their tariff dates.

Lifers – A Time For Change
In the previous two issues of Inside Time (May & June) there have been articles regarding the release of life sentenced prisoners who are well over their tariff dates. Sir David Latham, the chairman of the Parole Board, has raised various concerns and called on his own members to start releasing more lifers as it is evident that many of those over tariff are actually no threat to society whatsoever. The reality being that the vast majority of those over their tariff dates could be safely managed within the community, which in effect would save the government millions of pounds. Very few people would dispute the fact that lifers released on life license have the lowest percentage of reconviction rates, in the region of 2%. The question must be asked as to why so many lifers over tariff continue to languish within this vastly overcrowded prison system? What purpose is this actually serving? Who is really benefitting from this and isn’t it logical to assume that the longer a person is left incarcerated the more chance there is of failure?
Sir David Latham openly blames his own members for not releasing more lifers simply due to the adverse publicity by the media regarding the reoffending of some high profile cases/individuals. Is it not the case that we have the right to have our cases reviewed at regular intervals by an independent/ impartial panel? Is it not the case that the panel should not be prejudiced/ biased, nor influenced by anything other than the facts of the case in front of them? So, by Sir David’s own admission, is it not the case that those well over their tariff dates could actually have a case to make under Article 6 of the European Rights Act? In my view there should be an overall shake up of the mandatory life sentence and the parole process and measures should be incorporated to create a fairer more ‘just’ system for all of us.
Firstly abolish the mandatory life sentence. Yet reserve such sentences for the worst possible cases where life should mean life. In effect, sentences should be passed to reflect the nature/ circumstances of that offence. A man goes out for a drink with his mates, when he returns home later he finds his wife or girlfriend has been unfaithful, they argue and, in a moment of complete madness he attacks her and she dies. If found guilty of murder he is automatically sentenced to a mandatory life sentence. A man goes out with the sole intention of murder in mind, abducts a child and subjects that child to an horrendous ordeal before killing her. If found guilty he will receive a mandatory life sentence but could be out before the man convicted of the domestic murder, which is absolutely ludicrous. In the first instance the judge could take into account the circumstances of the case and decide that it doesn’t merit a mandatory life sentence but does warrant a fixed term of say 10 – 15 years. In the latter case he could either pass a life means life sentence or alternatively a fixed term of say 40 – 50 years.
Secondly, abolish the present parole system and replace it with a tribunal hearing. If it is deemed that the lifer does not pose a threat to life and limb then the panel can have the power to release and that release should be immediate. Also, if release is denied then knockbacks should be a maximum of 12 months. Thirdly, moving a lifer to category D open conditions should rest with the prison he/she is being held at. Surely if they are authorised to recategorise to C and write parole reports to determine that lifers future, then I’m quite sure they must be qualified enough to judge whether or not that individual is suitable for open conditions. Finally, the criteria surrounding the license recall system should be abolished. It should be a simple case of no finding of guilt by a court for a further offence, then no recall permitted.
At a cost of millions there are lifers who are well over tariff in prisons up and down the country that shouldn’t be and don’t need to be. In reality 99.9% will never commit another crime, let alone take somebody’s life. It is clearly time for change now. Does it not say in the parole board’s own rules surrounding the release of life sentence prisoners – “The panel must focus on risk alone. If the panel is satisfied that the applicant will not go out and commit a similar offence to what they have been convicted of, then release should be directed.” It is evident to most that those who have served their tariff could be safely managed in the community. It is a complete waste of money and resources to keep them in prison any longer. It was not so long ago that David Cameron and Nick Clegg stood side by side and stated that it is now time for change. That it was their objective to create a safer, fairer Britain for every single one of us? Let us hope that those words extend to those lifers sitting in prison cells up and down the country that no longer need to be there. Maybe they could take a leaf out of Barack Obama’s book and ask the nation if they can do it, and the nation’s answer will be YES YOU CAN!
Kenny Carter is currently resident at HMP Hull